点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
“五个一百”绘大美中国精彩画卷******
中青漫评丨“五个一百”绘大美中国精彩画卷
以“团结奋进新征程 同心奋斗创伟业”为主题的2022中国正能量“五个一百”网络精品征集评选展播活动进入报送阶段，“五个一百”以正能量引领亿万流量，用主旋律奏响奋进乐章，绘就大美中国的精彩画卷。
“五个一百”勾勒中国繁荣昌盛图景。今日之中国，山河壮丽。北京冬奥会、冬残奥会成功举办，神舟十三号、十四号、十五号接力腾飞，第三艘航母“福建舰”下水，首架国产C919大飞机正式交付，白鹤滩水电站全面投产……一幅幅时代巨变的壮美画卷上，写满了波澜壮阔，闪耀着璀璨荣光。“五个一百”，观察国家发展的脉络，描绘出中华大地奔腾不息的改革实践，展现社会革故鼎新的精神风貌，用情用力讲述了壮丽的时代、火热的生活、奋斗的场景，笔锋所致皆是美好风景，镜头所及都是美美的中国。
“五个一百”传播中国昂扬奋进声音。今日之中国，人民伟大。面对风高浪急的国际环境和艰巨繁重的国内改革发展稳定任务，14亿多中国人民团结一心、守望相助。粮食产量喜获“十九连丰”、国内生产总值超过120万亿元；面对疫情防控、山火救援、抗震减灾等众多挑战，全体人民众志成城、攻坚克难，时刻彼此扶持，或咫尺邻里、或隔着屏幕，一抹抹的温暖直抵人心……中国取得的系列成就、累累硕果，“人民”二字总是贯穿其中、延伸脉络。“五个一百”抒写了伟大人民之奋进赞歌，把英雄人民的故事传唱到祖国每个角落，把人民英雄的气概讴歌进每个人心间，让更多人在相信中国、热爱中国、赞美中国的激荡共鸣中凝聚共识，鼓舞广大人民为祖国发展进步而不懈奋斗。
“五个一百”厚植青年浓厚家国情怀。今日之中国，青春澎湃。一个国家的进步，刻印着青年的足迹；一个民族的未来，寄望于青春的力量。疫情防控、乡村振兴、航天工程，一个个日新月异的变化，让青春充满自信与自豪；穿行在大街小巷的外卖小哥，奔忙在北京冬奥会赛场和疫情防控中的志愿者，每一抹动人的平凡之光，让青春充满向上向善的力量……指尖跃动间、镜头挥舞处，涌动的是满满正能量，生动展现了新时代90后、00后的责任担当。“五个一百”不断涌现青年“微光”，让更多的人感受青年的家国情怀，也推动更多的青年人在民族复兴征程中擦亮青春底色。
与祖国同行，为时代放歌。总有一种力量让我们勇往向前，总有一种精神时刻照亮前方。“五个一百”让正能量澎湃大流量，展现大美中国的崭新气象、勾画人民英雄的感人至深、激昂时代青年的朝气蓬勃，让我们踏着“五个一百”的奋进鼓点，努力以“大美中国”的强劲“音符”，奏响“同心奋斗”的精彩乐章。(文/马铭泽 图/李恒毅)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)